Search:
San Francisco Restaurants -
Restaurants -
Music -
Meta Web Search -
Meta Local Search -
News -
Quotes -
Encyclopedia -
Dictionary -
Images -
Blogs -
Videos
Home » Article » Internet-and-Businesses-Online Employee or Independent Contractor?
Tony Novak filed under "Internet-and-Businesses-Online"
|
Small business owners and self-employed individuals often need
to deal with the complicated and often confusing issue of
distinguishing between “employee” and “independent contractor”
status. This issue is especially important to the growing number
of individuals working from home. Usually the goal of the
businessperson is to justify an independent contractor status
while the IRS prefers to assert an employer/employee
relationship for wage tax purposes. But you may wish to retain
eligibility for certain employee benefit plans, even if you may
be considered a contractor for wage tax purposes.
There are potentially serious consequences for making a mistake
in this area. If the IRS reclassifies a worker as an employee,
the employer may owe all of the retroactive wage taxes
immediately – even those not collected from the worker! There
may be additional interest and tax penalties. When a mistake is
discovered in an employee benefit plan, the plan administrator
may refuse to convey benefits to a worker who is not eligible
for the benefit. This could be disastrous in the case of a
business life insurance or health insurance plan. Since there
are no absolute rules in this area of business management, it is
always wise to consult with your own financial and tax adviser.
The rules used to determine status for wage tax purposes do not
apply for eligibility in employee benefit plans. It is possible
to be considered eligible for an employee benefit plan but
actually be treated as a contractor for wage tax purposes. The
opposite is also true – you may not be eligible for employee
benefits but still be considered an employee for tax purposes.
Determining eligibility for employee benefits is actually much
easier – this is stated clearly in the written plan description
for each individual employee benefit. Just be careful not to
assume that the classification for one issue has any effect on
the determination for another purpose.
If your goal is to make sure that a work arrangement is really a
contractor relationship, the most effective thing you can do is
to send a letter to your contractor which details the
relationship and addresses each of the topics addressed below.
Get the other party to acknowledge the letter and to hold a copy
of the letter in their records as well. Best of all worlds is to
have a written contract in which the topics in my letter would
be incorporated. In either case, make sure you DO what you write.
These 20 factors are taken from IRS Revenue Ruling 87?41. There
is no set number of factors that must be in your favor, so the
idea is to get as much insurance as possible. We suggest that
you meet 15 out of 20 of the factors in your favor to be “safe”.
1. Does the principal provide instructions to the worker about
when, where, and how he or she is to perform the work? 2. Does
the principal provide training to the worker? 3. Are the
services provided by the worker integrated into the principal's
business operations? 4. Must the services be rendered personally
by the worker? 5. Does the principal hire, supervise and pay
assistants to the worker? 6. Is there a continuing relationship
between the principal and the worker? 7. Does the principal set
the work hours and schedule? 8. Does the worker devote
substantially full time to the business of the principal? 9. Is
the work performed on the principal's premises? 10. Is the
worker required to perform the services in an order or sequence
set by the principal? 11. Is the worker required to submit oral
or written reports to the principal? 12. Is the worker paid by
the hour, week, or month? 13. Does the principal pay the
business or traveling expenses of the worker? 14. Does the
principal furnish significant tools, materials and equipment?
15. Does the worker have a significant investment in facilities?
16. Can the worker realize a profit or loss as a result of his
or her services? 17. Does the worker provide services for more
than one firm at a time? 18. Does the worker make his or her
services available to the general public? 19. Does the principal
have the right to discharge the worker at will? 20. Can the
worker terminate his or her relationship with the principal any
time he or she wishes without incurring liability to the
principal?
If you cannot easily meet the standards of this 20-point test,
don’t worry yet. There is another “safe harbor” provision added
to the tax law a few years ago. If you can show that a
substantial portion of your industry uses sub-contractors in the
same status as your particular position, then you are safe in
considering yourself also as a sub-contractor. The difficulty in
relying on this safe harbor test is that you need to be reactive
to your industry and the IRS, rather than be pro-active in
designing your business relationships for the effect that you
desire.
About the author:
Tony Novak, MBA, MT is a writer and financial adviser in
Narberth, PA focusing on tax and employee benefit issues. His
businesses www.MedSave.com and Freedom Benefits Association
provide online benefits enrollment for thousands of individuals
and businesses nationwide.
|
|