Search:
San Francisco Restaurants -
Restaurants -
Music -
Meta Web Search -
Meta Local Search -
News -
Quotes -
Encyclopedia -
Dictionary -
Images -
Blogs -
Videos
Home » Article » Health-and-Fitness Can Western Medicine Accept Chinese Medicine?
Brian B. Carter, MS, LAc filed under "Health-and-Fitness"
|
Q: My doctor is skeptical of Chinese medicine. Is there a way to
make it acceptable to the western medicine way of thinking?
A: This is a complicated issue. Ideally, we could use scientific
research to make this possible. This has been done to some
extent. However, there are still problems with research and its
acceptance.
Not Testing Authentic Chinese Medicine
Studies often diverge from authentic Chinese medicine
methodology. Investigators rarely make use of pattern
discrimination, which is fundamental to Chinese medicine. Also,
studies have yet to acknowledge another reality of CM - its
plurality. There are many ways to practice it, and many many
herb formulas, herb combinations, acupuncture point
combinations, and needling techniques.
See What You Want To See
Plus, studies of people reading and using studies have proven
that when we disagree with a study's conclusions, we are much
more critical of its methodology and validity than when the
results agree with our beliefs. That is a breakdown in the
scientific method. In the scientific method, we let study
outcomes revise our beliefs - not the other way around.
The Good Research That's Out There
If you want to see good acupuncture research, and great
commentary by an MD who devotes his medical practice fully to
acupuncture, and who studies authentic CM, go to Acubriefs.com.
I did a short review of the best acupuncture studies since the
1997 National Institutes of Health statement.
Effectiveness and Proof are Secondary
An interesting twist: Historian and anthropologist Paul
Unschuld's suggests that the acceptance of any medicine has more
to do with how it fits or doesn't fit with the social zeitgeist
(spirit of the times). People must understand a medicine in a
way that fits with their beliefs and values first. Scientific
evidence, and personal experience of effectiveness are secondary.
Acceptance by Western Medicine
But as for acceptance by western docs- it depends on the doc. I
doubt the AMA is going to be accepting Chinese medicine as a
separate and equally valid medical system. But some individual
docs might.
Who Speaks For Western Medicine?
According to Modern Healthcare Magazine, "Not counting medical
students and residents, who are lured by deep discounts in
annual dues, AMA members account for only about 29 per cent of
726,000 practicing doctors in America."
This raises the question- who represents most doctors? How do we
know what they think or want?
I did an internet search, both on Google and Yahoo, for other
medical organizations... most of them were state, or
country-oriented.
I did find a few others, but their membership numbers may
overlap:
The Christian Medical and Dental Associations (CMDA) - 17,000
members American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) - 2,000
members American Holistic Medicine Association (AHMA) -
membership not listed
So even though the AMA represents less than one-third of
physicians, it doesn't appear that any other organization has
nearly as many members. Perhaps no one speaks for Western
medicine.
Pattern Discrimination Isn't So Strange
Besides all the distinct ontology (the study of what exists)
like meridians and organ-systems, a fundamentally unique feature
of CM (used in China to differentiate CM from WM) is pattern
discrimination.
Different treatment for different symptom/sign patterns is not
really that strange. Western docs don't give all patients the
same antihypertensive drugs, for example. It depends on the
patient, and there are specific groupings according to symptoms,
signs, and other diagnoses. We do the same thing - just
different groupings.
Regardless, many Western docs look down their nose at pattern
discrimination. Perhaps they don't think it's scientific enough?
They don't see the benefit. It's outside their paradigm.
Inequality in Credibility and Authority
Chinese medicine's biggest obstacle to making progress
politically and in the media is that MD's are seen as the one
true medical authority. They are the experts on everything. Pure
scientists don't get as much attention, nor do scholars, or
Master's degree people. Politicians and journalists both have
this perspective. Because of this, our objections (to the
actions of AMA, FDA, and drug companies against Chinese herbal
medicine) go unheard. We are not seen as being as competent to
assess dangers. Nor do they take Chinese docs very seriously.
You have to either be an MD or affiliated with a big institution.
So, to summarize, you can't convince some people no matter what.
Others will get behind Chinese medicine regardless. Those in the
middle will be swayed by the media and their friends.
It's going to take some time for enough of us to have the
degrees, affiliations, and willingness to make statements loud
enough to be heard above the din of the prevailing winds.
About the author:
Acupuncturist, herbalist, and medical professor Brian B. Carter
founded the alternative health megasite The Pulse of Oriental
Medicine (http://www.PulseMed.org/). He is the author of the
book "Powerful Body, Peaceful Mind: How to Heal Yourself with
Foods, Herbs, and Acupressure" (November, 2004). Brian speaks on
radio across the country, and has been quoted and interviewed by
Real Simple, Glamour, and ESPN magazines.
|
|